The Mystification and Demystification of Wine
“Wow, you’re into wine. That is so cool. I know nothing about wine. It is too complicated for me. I leave that to the experts and rich people.”
Heard that one before? I am sure you have. We all have. This is definitely a uniquely American attitude towards wine. Deferrential and dismissive due to lack of knowledge with almost a cultural instinct to heighten wine to pedestal-like status is the trap at least every American has fallen into at least once. Wine lover or not. It is programmed into us and as a result of this, in order for Americans to embrace wine and accept it it has to be demystified first. It is a cultural trapping that I believe is damaging what little wine culture we have and has greatly damaged the wine world.
First, in Europe, the cultural paradigm regarding wine is that it is pervades most aspects and spheres of life. It has always been that way since Greek and Roman times. There was never a class system involving wine as there is in America where it is seen as a rich man’s sport or a special occasion for the middle class and not an option for the lower class or the poor.
In Italy, wine is seen as an integral part of the meal and was used as a calorie supplement for the poor for ages. Wine was and still is mostly drunk at home with the family and typically the drinking of wine starts at a very young age. That would be impossible in America as the drinking age here is 21. In the States, the drinking age is more of the sign for a person to drink as much as they can of whatever they can find for many years, as this is what they have been waiting for their whole life. In Spain, wine is also an everyday item, especially as it is used in many of the festivals that are common throughout the country. In Spain a meal is incomplete without wine. In America a meal is incomplete without a salt shaker.
In many other countries around Europe, there are variants of these examples as wine is just seen as a part of everyday life, just as hamburgers, lemonade and hot dogs are everyday parts of American life. Now before I go any further, I want to explain these are facts describing the differences between the two wine cultures, if you can call what we have over here, a wine culture. What I am getting at is that we do not have a wine culture. Because of the drinking age, the demonization of alcohol in this country due to Prohibition and organizations such as MADD, and the resultant attitudes we have no wine culture. That is why wine gets mystified in this country.
Wine is the other in the United States and always has been. Our earliest most famous drinker was Thomas Jefferson. Not a poor man or uneducated man by any means. He is seen as the nation’s first wine drinker and that has to be a big part of why wine is put on a pedestal in this country. There is no vinous icon like this in European countries. There were leaders and educated people who had great interest in wine but it was never a big deal as it was stateside because wine was a part of everybody’s lives so who cared if a leader or aristocrat liked wine. In the US there are many books on Jefferson’s love of wine and ironically one of the biggest alleged wine fraud cases in US History actually involves “signed Jefferson bottles.” This case against Hardy Rodenstock, filed by billionaire James Koch, is still pending. Talk about wine on a pedestal!
Wine in American culture developed to be the drink of the rich, famous and elite. Everybody had to have a wine cellar as they got rich. It was part of the deal along with the new car, big house and trophy wife. It was status. Since there was no culture here it was ripe for the picking and picked it was. This created a snowball effect that has affected almost every aspect of global wine culture. As America goes, the rest of the world eventually follows, no matter how bad or counter-intuitive the idea is.
When I was growing up, wine seemed so inaccessible and unreachable as a result of this thought paradigm that had gripped America in regards to wine. Beer and booze seemed so much more easy to understand as it was firmly in my mind that these were tools to get drunk with when I turned 18 and then 21 as it changed to 21 when I was like 15 or something, making wine all the more unreachable
So now that wine was firmly entrenched as the drink of the rich, educated and elite, the mystification had happened and from that point on whenever wine was explained, written about, taught or talked about in any way it had to be dumbed down to the lowest common denominator because it was inaccessible.
So now the environment was ripe for people to capitalize on this idea. There was the consumer advocate, Robert Parker, who made people feel good about their purchases buy assigning wines numerical ratings. Dumbing down wine to a number was easy enough. It made wine more “accessible.” Because wine was such an elitist pastime in America, it was perfectly natural that a Ralph Nader-like consumer advocate became popular.
We all know the negative effects of Robert Parker. Homogenization of wine due to winemakers making wine for his palate, the assigning of a numerical score that has become the be-all end-all of pricing structure for many of the world’s great wines and of course one man having an inordinate amount of power. First it was in America and then slowly over the rest of the wine world. He could make and break a winery by the keyboard stroke.
There was also the “lifestyle” magazine, Wine Spectator, that promoted that Michelin 3-Star lifestyle associated with wine, which is the best restaurants, nicest resorts, fanciest hotels, fastest cars etc. It also had the eponymous 100 point system which almost all critics in the USA have become a prisoner to. Even the wonderful David Schildknecht had to be converted from his star system when Parker recruited him to work for the Wine Advocate.
What is the most popular wine book in America anyway? Wine for Dummies of course. Could it be anything else? Of course not. The irony here is that this is actually a great and very informative book and I always do recommend it but many people shy away from it due to the title that makes them feel like an idiot. So one of the better books out there on wine is calling its readers idiots for the sake of selling books? Sounds counterintuitive? That is the wine culture in this country.
The Wine Advocate and The Wine Spectator played a major role in the demystification of wine due to the aforementioned class issues that surrounded wine due to there being no wine culture in the United States. Many burgeoning wine writers followed this format as an example and their editors were typically very strict with them which led to mostly moronic wine writing. Because wine was “inaccessible” wine had to be made “accessible” and the way to do that was to write like you were writing for a ten year old learning division for the first time. Constantly redefining terms was and is an incessant problem. Many editors assume that nobody knows anything about wine, no one will ever read more than one article on wine and no one will spend any money on wine. Combine those three thoughts that are almost universally accepted by magazine and book editors, it’s a tough market for the true wine writer.
All this a result of not having wine around since the beginning and in that context that Europe has. Wine was an opportunity for bettering yourself and going to the next level which usually meant more money in your life. Everyone was constantly learning about wine so writers had to adapt and assume any article they wrote was going to be written for newbies as no one ever read more than one article on wine. Look at the bridge column of a newspaper. I don’t know about Bridge. I don’t care about Bridge either. If I decided to learn about Bridge I sure as hell wouldn’t pick up a newspaper because I would have no idea what is going on there. The pictures of cards, the weird symbols, some text, it was all am jumble to me and I almost feared it. If I wanted to I would get a beginner’s Bridge book or just google it.
So where does this lead us? It is harsh, but many people are interested in wine and with the delusion of grandeur that the internet provides, we have a bunch of idiots that think they know something. It is a delusion of competency. These are the people who say “all wine is subjective” or “I know what I like.” Or the great one of “How can you be an expert in wine, something that is so subjective?” These are the real perpetuators of wine misinformation. Saying it is all so simple is bullshit and an easy cop-out and exactly what people want to hear.